3-2 | Table of Con­tents | http://​dx​.doi​.org/10.17742/IMAGE.sightoil.3-2.6 | Gis­mon­di | David­son PDF


ABSTRACT: For much of the his­to­ry of Alberta’s tar sands, a series of visu­al con­ven­tions have shaped Cana­di­an imag­i­nar­ies of the resource, the emer­gence of the non-con­ven­tion­al oil indus­try, and the min­ing of oil.  We intro­duce a series of archival images dat­ing from 1880 until the open­ing of Great Cana­di­an Oil Sands (Sun­cor) in 1967, to ana­lyze how visu­al rep­re­sen­ta­tions were used to jus­ti­fy gov­ern­ment and pub­lic sup­port for bitu­men min­ing and refin­ing, to legit­i­mate state research into the sep­a­ra­tion of oil from the sands, and to ide­o­log­i­cal­ly sus­tain pub­lic fund­ing of the devel­op­ment of this unique Cana­di­an resource indus­try. We con­clude that many ele­ments of these ear­ly pos­i­tive nor­ma­tive con­cep­tu­al frame­works remain in play today, used by cor­po­rate and gov­ern­ment meaning–makers to blunt con­tem­po­rary cri­tiques by the pub­lic of social and eco­log­i­cal trade­offs, and ulti­mate­ly to legit­i­mate Alber­ta and Canada’s pur­suit of non-con­ven­tion­al oil as an accept­able ener­gy future.

RÉSUMÉ : Au cours de l’histoire alber­taine, une série de con­ven­tions visuelles ont con­tribué à façon­ner l’imaginaire cana­di­en des ressources naturelles, l’émergence d’une indus­trie pétrolière non con­ven­tion­nelle, et les pra­tiques d’extraction minière. Nous pro­posons ici un regroupe­ment d’images d’archives allant de 1880 jusqu’à l’ouverture de Great Cana­di­an Oil Sands (Sun­cor) en 1967, afin de mon­tr­er le rôle de ces con­ven­tions visuelles dans plusieurs sphères. Pre­mière­ment dans la jus­ti­fi­ca­tion des sou­tiens gou­verne­men­taux et publiques de l’industrie d’extraction et de raf­fi­nage. Ensuite dans la légal­i­sa­tion des recherch­es sur la sépa­ra­tion du pét­role et des sables. Enfin dans le main­tien idéologique du finance­ment pub­lic pour le développe­ment de cette indus­trie d’exception au sein des ressources cana­di­ennes. En con­clu­sion, nous indiquons que même aujourd’hui, les entre­pris­es et les faiseurs d’opinions poli­tiques utilisent plusieurs élé­ments de ces pre­mières méth­odes con­ceptuelles nor­ma­tives. Ils le font pour émouss­er les cri­tiques con­tem­po­raines en faveur des com­pro­mis social et écologique, et ultime­ment pour légitimer l’industrie d’extraction pétrolière non con­ven­tion­nelle dans l’avenir.

Mike Gis­mon­di | Athabas­ca University
Debra J. David­son | Uni­ver­si­ty of Alberta

Imagining the Tar Sands 1880-1967 and Beyond

[…B]y seek­ing to com­pre­hend this photograph—by look­ing at it, by look­ing through it, and by think­ing with it—in terms of the mean­ings that swirled around it, we can achieve a clear­er and fuller under­stand­ing of time and place, land­scape and iden­ti­ty, image and real­i­ty. (Joan Schwartz 107)

Fig. 1  G.B. Dowl­ing, Geo­log­i­cal Sur­vey of Cana­da; Tar Sands Athabas­ca Riv­er, Alta

Introduction

The visu­al record of activ­i­ty in the Athabas­ca tar sands of North­ern Alber­ta extends more than 120 years and claims over a cen­tu­ry of sto­ry­telling, in which the pho­to­graph­ic images built a pub­lic imag­i­nary of the land­scape and the indus­try. [1]

Ear­ly pho­tographs helped nation­al and inter­na­tion­al audi­ences pic­ture a remote geo­graph­ic place and led them to see in the tar sands its eco­nom­ic poten­tial for a young Cana­di­an nation. In the province of Alber­ta (found­ed in 1905) that visu­al record worked along­side polit­i­cal nar­ra­tives of mean­ing-mak­ing to legit­i­mate an uncer­tain and pre­car­i­ous pub­lic invest­ment through­out the entire time peri­od of our study. Rep­re­sent­ing the tar sands as an immense resource in the wilds of Cana­da, and its exploita­tion as hero­ic, his­toric, and car­ried out by hardy Alber­tans, car­ried the quest to extract non-con­ven­tion­al oil from the tar sands into broad­er Cana­di­an nar­ra­tives of the con­quest of nature: the holy grail to coun­try­wide nation-build­ing. [2]

From the late 1880s onwards, pho­tographs of “the Athabas­ca tar sands” would begin to evoke both a geo­graph­ic place and a nat­ur­al resource in the minds of col­o­niz­ers and set­tlers in Cal­gary and Edmon­ton or inter­est­ed bureau­crats in Ottawa, and investors in far­away Mon­tre­al, New York, or Lon­don, Eng­land. The cam­era use by geol­o­gists, sur­vey­ors, and trav­el­ers added cred­i­bil­i­ty to claims about poten­tial nat­ur­al rich­es at the edge of a remote north­west Cana­di­an fron­tier. Images pic­tur­ing the land­scapes as extrac­tive (Pratt and Karvel­las; Schwartz 966) were rein­forced by the clas­si­cal per­cep­tion that the cam­era pro­vid­ed a doc­u­men­tary record of real­i­ty (Mraz 163-192). For much of its his­to­ry, a series of visu­al con­ven­tions or tropes have shaped Cana­di­an per­cep­tions of the min­ing of oil and the industry’s dif­fi­cult emer­gence.  Two excep­tion­al­ly pos­i­tive sto­ry­lines emerged: (1) the appli­ca­tion of human inge­nu­ity, sci­ence, and tech­nol­o­gy to release use­able crude oil from the bonds of sandy bitu­men, and (2) the key impor­tance of the Alber­ta state and pub­lic invest­ment in the process to open Alberta’s north­ern wilder­ness to com­mer­cial invest­ment and indus­try. Like all pow­er­ful social facts, these well-con­struct­ed mean­ings and images now appear famil­iar to mod­ern read­ers, inter­nal­ized and nor­mal­ized, part of our men­tal inven­to­ry of rep­re­sen­ta­tions of the devel­op­ment of this unique Cana­di­an resource. In this paper, we high­light a series of key indi­vid­u­als, projects, and socio-his­tor­i­cal chap­ters in that process of nor­mal­iza­tion. Many of these ear­ly pho­tographs and asso­ci­at­ed sto­ry­lines have been repro­duced in archives and news­pa­pers, muse­um dis­plays and inter­pre­tive exhibits, mag­a­zines and text­books, a nation­al stamp depict­ing the bitu­mi­nous sands indus­try of Alber­ta, and a des­ig­nat­ed Alber­ta her­itage site (Bitu­mont). Arche­types of indus­tri­al devel­op­ment, they medi­ate pub­lic per­cep­tions of real­i­ty, and until recent­ly sus­tained the industry’s rep­u­ta­tion in a pos­i­tive light. As Schwartz explains, “if pho­tographs record out­ward appear­ance with unpar­al­leled real­ism, their opti­cal pre­ci­sion does not pre­clude ide­o­log­i­cal con­tent” (169).

Con­cen­trat­ing on the dom­i­nant read­ings of tar sands visu­als from 1880 until the open­ing of Great Cana­di­an Oil Sands (Sun­cor) in 1967, we ana­lyze how a net­work of images and mean­ings teamed up with sci­en­tif­ic or polit­i­cal expla­na­tions to legit­i­mate state sup­port for bitu­men min­ing, the sep­a­ra­tion of oil from the sands, and the com­mer­cial via­bil­i­ty of the indus­try. Geo­g­ra­phers Cas­tree and Braun argue that images work togeth­er with dis­cours­es as acts “of con­cep­tu­al con­stru­al” (167): what Hajer and Ver­steeg describe as an “‘epis­temic’ qual­i­ty… inac­ces­si­ble to sub­jects but that nev­er­the­less steer them in their think­ing” (181). In this paper, we draw to the sur­face pat­terns across a series of his­tor­i­cal images of the tar sands to argue how these ele­ments formed part of an increas­ing­ly sophis­ti­cat­ed cul­tur­al web of mean­ings that guid­ed pub­lic con­scious­ness in these ear­ly years. We con­clude that many of the ele­ments of these con­cep­tu­al frame­works remain in play in con­tem­po­rary pol­i­tics, used in new ways to con­tin­ue to influ­ence meaning–making about society/nature rela­tions, blunt the con­tem­po­rary cri­tique of social and eco­log­i­cal trade­offs, and legit­i­mate state sup­port for non-con­ven­tion­al oil for the future of civ­i­liza­tion (David­son and Gismondi).

Age of Discovery

Look­ing at pho­tographs in his­tor­i­cal geog­ra­phy is, ulti­mate­ly, not a search for ‘truth’ but rather a mode of inquiry. By going beyond sub­ject con­tent and pho­to­graph­ic real­ism to think more broad­ly about the way in which pho­tographs, gath­ered in the empir­i­cal prac­tices of explo­ration and sur­vey­ing, played an active role in the pro­duc­tion of geo­graph­i­cal knowl­edge and the con­struc­tion of imag­i­na­tive geo­gra­phies. (Schwartz 125)

The open­ing pho­to­graph, tak­en on the banks of the Athabas­ca Riv­er in 1892, shows two men, per­haps Gov­ern­ment of Cana­da geol­o­gists, dwarfed by an enor­mous band of tar sands (Fig. 1). The angle of the image, the appar­ent scale of the resource, the sur­vey mark­er, and the gaze of gov­ern­ment employ­ees con­firm obser­va­tions by adven­tur­ers, explor­ers, and nat­u­ral­ists who report­ed tar ponds and streams of oil weep­ing down the river­banks of the Athabas­ca Riv­er. Dowling’s pho­tographs, while high­ly direct­ed, added cred­i­bil­i­ty to ear­ly reports in 1882 by Dr. Robert Bell, a field geol­o­gist who became act­ing direc­tor of the Geo­log­i­cal Sur­vey of Cana­da. Bell believed that beneath the sandy pitch and belts of black tar sands lay “pools of petro­le­um.” Like oth­er post-Con­fed­er­a­tion gov­ern­ment sur­vey work in the north­west, Dowling’s reports also affirmed Canada’s sov­er­eign­ty at a time when the Unit­ed States and Britain cov­et­ed the same region. Inven­to­ries, maps, and reports by sur­vey­ors and engi­neers were both prac­ti­cal tools and sym­bols of state pow­er. Replac­ing the old­er prac­tice of hand drawn land­scapes, ear­ly pho­tographs detail­ing the poten­tial of the tar sands brought doc­u­men­tary cer­tain­ty to the tar sands and its place in “the idea of a transcon­ti­nen­tal nation­al exis­tence” (Zeller 9).

Oth­er pio­neers like Count Alfred Von Ham­mer­stein would punch holes along the Athabas­ca Riv­er in the ear­ly 1900s hop­ing to hit con­ven­tion­al oil. Kodak images of Von Hammerstein’s drill works appeared in Agnes Deans Cameron’s wide­ly read The New North: Being Some Account of a Woman’s Jour­ney through Cana­da to the Arc­tic (1909, see Fig. 2). While the Count was unsuc­cess­ful drilling for “ele­phant pools of oil,” Deans Cameron’s book and its images became a best sell­er and made her a media celebri­ty. Deans Cameron would lec­ture across Cana­da and the Unit­ed States about her “Jour­neys through Unknown Cana­da.” As a Cana­di­an Gov­ern­ment rep­re­sen­ta­tive in Britain, with mag­ic lantern slides of her pho­to­graph­ic images on dis­play, she pro­mot­ed Prairie immi­gra­tion. She offered this descrip­tion of the Athabas­ca region:

In all Cana­da there is no more inter­est­ing stretch of water­way than that upon which we are enter­ing. An earth-move­ment here has cre­at­ed a line of fault clear­ly vis­i­ble for sev­en­ty or eighty miles along the riv­er-bank, out of which oil oozes at fre­quent inter­vals. […] Tar there is […] in plen­ty. […] It oozes from every fis­sure, and into some bitu­mi­nous tar well we can poke a twen­ty foot pole and find no resis­tance. (71)

Her pho­tographs were recent­ly repro­duced in an exhib­it at the Cana­di­an Muse­um of Civ­i­liza­tion in Ottawa, Canada.

Fig. 2  Rob­son Stu­dio, Hammerstein’s Oil Works, Oil and Gas Well, Athabas­ca District

Fig. 3  Alfred Von Ham­mer­stein, Tar Sands and Flow­ing Asphal­tum in the Athabas­ca District

As a pro­mot­er, Von Ham­mer­stein would work the region for almost forty years. This image (Fig. 3) from the ear­ly 1900s is attrib­uted to him by the Library and Archives Cana­da and shows tar weep­ing from the riv­er bank with the scrib­bled note “Tar Sands and flow­ing Asphal­tum in the Athabas­ca Dis­trict ca. 1908.” The same image is also held by The Alber­ta Provin­cial Archives and includes the leg­end “mil­lions of tons of mate­r­i­al in sight.” The Provin­cial Archive of Alber­ta file advis­es that the image is a “Frag­ment of print­ed pub­lic­i­ty leaflet on the Athabas­ca District’s oil poten­tial and illus­tra­tion of oil sand expo­sure on riv­er bank.” A gloss of math­e­mat­i­cal scrib­bles left by one eager read­er sug­gests more (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4  Oil Sand Expo­sure Near Fort McMurray

Images of bitu­men and oil seep­ing from the Athabas­ca Riv­er banks (Fig. 3 and 4) act­ed like eye­wit­ness tes­ti­mo­ny (Burke) invok­ing the scale and immen­si­ty of the resource for those liv­ing in dis­tant cities, rein­forc­ing nar­ra­tives of com­mer­cial pos­si­bil­i­ty espe­cial­ly in the minds of gov­ern­ment admin­is­tra­tors and petro­le­um investors. The effect of image on per­cep­tion stemmed from an his­tor­i­cal­ly spe­cif­ic view, as Schwartz argues, that cam­era images were a mir­ror of real­i­ty: “the soci­ety which pro­duced and con­sumed these images placed unwa­ver­ing faith in the truth­ful­ness of the pho­to­graph­ic image and its abil­i­ty to act as a sur­ro­gate for first-hand see­ing”; the pho­to­graph became a “sur­ro­gate for first-hand observation—a con­vinc­ing visu­al expe­ri­ence akin to ‘being there’” (Schwartz 113). Pre­sent­ing cor­nu­copi­an images of the Cana­di­an North, mem­bers of the Geo­log­i­cal Sur­vey and entre­pre­neurs like Von Ham­mer­stein and writ­ers like Deans Cameron par­took in a process that anthro­pol­o­gists call turn­ing sights into sites,’ where­by images become cul­tur­al or sym­bol­ic short­hand that instill pre­ferred mean­ings onto a geo­graph­ic space. At the start of the petro­le­um and auto­mo­bile age in Cana­da, such images from Alberta’s North pre­saged new eco­nom­ic sta­ples and indi­cat­ed new direc­tions for indus­tri­al futures. As with oth­er sta­ples, the tar sands also promised enor­mous wealth and per­son­al pow­er for those who con­trolled it (Huber 2008). The sto­ries and visu­al impres­sions of the pro­mot­ers of the tar sands were not all truth­ful, but they were true in their effects; draw­ing entre­pre­neurs, investors, and both lev­els of gov­ern­ment into the region, as well as into a par­tic­u­lar way of see­ing the land­scape. Von Ham­mer­stein would be named to the Cana­di­an Petro­le­um Hall of Fame in 2011 (“Hon­oured CPHFS Members”).

The Government Gaze

Fig. 5  Roy Ells,  Dr. Sid­ney Ells at Fort McMur­ray Tar Sands

Syd­ney Ells, con­sid­ered by some the “father of Alber­ta bitu­mi­nous sands research” (Ells 101) spent over thir­ty years as sur­vey­or, car­tog­ra­ph­er, and engi­neer research­ing tar sands for the Cana­di­an Gov­ern­ment Depart­ment of Mines. His field sur­vey of the bitu­mi­nous sands along the Athabas­ca Riv­er in sum­mer 1913 exam­ined reach­es and trib­u­taries south and north of Fort McMur­ray, first pre­sent­ed in a Pre­lim­i­nary Report pub­lished in 1914 that com­prised over eighty-five dense pages, includ­ing forty photographs.

Fig. 6  Sid­ney Ells, Bitu­mi­nous Sand; Grand Rapids, Athabas­ca Riv­er District

In 1962, the Cana­di­an Depart­ment of Mines pub­lished his mem­oir, Reflec­tions of the Devel­op­ment of the Athabas­ca Oil Sands—a less tech­ni­cal nar­ra­tive of his career in the region, cov­er­ing the years between 1913 and 1945. From open­ing poem to clos­ing words, Ells sketch­es a man­ly fron­tier (Fig. 5) where skilled ‘white’ engi­neers super­vised urban ten­der­foots, with the assis­tance of ‘shift­less’ Abo­rig­i­nal labour. Ells’ mem­oir includes fas­ci­nat­ing images and descrip­tions of quar­ry­ing tech­niques, use of explo­sives, pow­er shov­els, and shalers in ear­ly min­ing activ­i­ties, along­side dis­cus­sions of var­i­ous paving tests and results of tri­als at sep­a­ra­tion of the oil from the sands. Described by his col­leagues as “one of these hardy pio­neers,” and a “rugged indi­vid­ual,” Ells admits he was seduced by the “romance of min­ing” (Ells 4). Despite the offi­cial top­ics, his reports come alive with recounts, in mus­cu­lar tone, of camp­ing in the open air at fifty-below zero, dry­ing clothes by camp­fire and repair­ing snow­shoes after a long day of win­ter sur­vey­ing. Ells lit­er­al­ly took the mea­sure of the place, con­cen­trat­ing his geologist’s eye on ver­ti­cal­i­ty and not on sur­faces. For months in 1913, he sur­veyed the region, mea­sur­ing and pho­tograph­ing the depth of bands of bitu­men deposits (Fig. 6), and the depths and den­si­ties of its over­bur­den. He iden­ti­fied high grade deposits (many in com­mer­cial play today) and his map work is espe­cial­ly atten­tive to the com­mer­cial chal­lenges of mov­ing the bitu­men to mar­ket, describ­ing the loca­tions of prime deposits, trans­porta­tion chal­lenges like cross­ing ter­raced land (Fig. 7) and impos­si­ble riv­er banks (Fig. 8), and cost pre­dic­tions per ton based on dis­tances from mine deposit to future railheads.

Fig. 7  Sid­ney Ells, Ter­race Struc­ture, Athabas­ca River

Ells’ orig­i­nal 1913 maps, and a lat­er series of topo­graph­i­cal maps he com­plet­ed in the ear­ly 1920s (sur­vey­ing over 1240 square miles of deposits), became the only com­pre­hen­sive maps of the region (and are avail­able at Glen­bow Muse­um, Cal­gary). One oil com­pa­ny offi­cial argued that indus­try spe­cial­ists relied upon his ear­ly maps well into the 1950s.

In Impe­r­i­al Land­scapes, Mitchell argues that maps, sur­veys, reports and pho­tographs of colo­nial agents con­strued ‘facts’ about a dis­tant geo­graph­ic place, and that this ‘gov­ern­ment gaze’ was used by state admin­is­tra­tors to guide polit­i­cal deci­sion-mak­ing about the man­age­ment of colo­nial peo­ples and resources from afar. Anoth­er researcher argues that ear­ly sur­vey and map­ping work chart­ing north­ern Cana­di­an resource land­scapes “pro­vid­ed a pro­vi­sion­al form of sur­veil­lance, con­trol, and super­vi­sion;” a “pro­jec­tion of state pow­er” over places and peo­ples (Sand­los 396). Anthro­pol­o­gist James Scott calls these “maps of leg­i­bil­i­ty,” con­ven­tion­al descrip­tions which sim­pli­fied com­plex real­i­ties for state admin­is­tra­tors in ways that mar­gin­al­ized cer­tain social groups and prac­tices, or val­ued cer­tain aspects of geo­log­ic for­ma­tions, wildlife, and ecosys­tems over oth­ers (2).

Fig. 8. Sid­ney Ells, Steep­bank River

Abo­rig­i­nal peo­ples are glimpsed occa­sion­al­ly in the dot­ted lines on Ells’ maps around reserves, or in images (Fig. 9) or diary descrip­tions of their labour as track­ers and freighters haul­ing the tar sands south. But like most reports of the age, they are emp­ty of Abo­rig­i­nal land uses—an omis­sion that Mitchell (10, 15) calls a ‘social hiero­glyph’ of the his­tor­i­cal social rela­tions they conceal.

Fig. 9  Dr. Karl Clark, Pack­ing dogs with Tar Sands, Ells Riv­er. The descrip­tion reads “uniden­ti­fied men with dogs packed with tar sands.”

Ells’ ear­ly reports and mem­oir are also large­ly devoid of atten­tion to ecosys­tems; for him, nat­ur­al sys­tems (cli­mate, local foods, dis­ease, weath­er, ter­rain, water­ways, and more) are sub­tly clas­si­fied as either sup­port­ing or inhibit­ing extrac­tive strate­gies. Nature is not denied, but cir­cum­scribed. At best the muskeg, for­est, and cli­mate are pre­sent­ed as human tri­als, obsta­cles to be endured and con­quered: “A fly-infest­ed coun­try, of many streams, in tim­bered or burned out areas, and almost lim­it­less muskeg” (Ells 10), to be over­come, in the mas­culin­ist dis­course of the day, by hardy men charged with devel­op­ing a mod­ern indus­tri­al nation. But it was under the dual gaze of com­merce and gov­ern­ment that the Athabas­ca ter­ri­to­ry became con­struct­ed into a com­mod­i­ty fron­tier, under­stood in terms of deposits of nat­ur­al resources, rela­tion­ships to mar­kets, and obsta­cles to extrac­tion of tar sands for human use. Rivers were seen for their nav­i­ga­ble prop­er­ties, not as nat­ur­al ecosystems—as means to move peo­ple and tech­nolo­gies inland or move prod­ucts out (only lat­er would the impor­tance of water for the sep­a­ra­tion and waste tail­ings process­es become impor­tant). Forests and muskeg became reduced to obstacles—not sources of bio­di­ver­si­ty and habi­tat. The orig­i­nal inhab­i­tants sim­ply became a part of that land­scape. Abo­rig­i­nal peo­ples became at best a poten­tial labour force or dis­ap­peared into a wilder­ness ter­rain. “Objec­tive images” and “dis­in­ter­est­ed sci­en­tif­ic facts” began to appear as more authen­tic depic­tions of the region, dis­plac­ing indige­nous and local under­stand­ings, while affirm­ing trav­el­er obser­va­tions with expert con­fir­ma­tion of geo­log­i­cal for­ma­tions, nav­i­ga­tion routes, engi­neer­ing opin­ions on poten­tial min­ing sites and so on—a topog­ra­phy of exploitation.

Fig. 10 H. S. Spence, Syd­ney Ells at Tar Sands Plant

Ells, the engi­neer blend­ed phys­i­cal mas­culin­i­ty with a con­fi­dence in the tech­no­log­i­cal dom­i­na­tion of nature (Fig. 10). Such atti­tudes were com­mon among engi­neers at this time, part of their civ­i­liz­ing mis­sion. Ear­ly ecol­o­gists shared in this ide­ol­o­gy of tech­no­log­i­cal progress in the 1920s, con­vinced of the role of sci­en­tif­ic knowl­edge in help­ing human soci­ety over­come the con­straints of nature (Lecain 57-59). Despite Ells’ pre­dic­tions, the scale of tar sands oper­a­tions remained lim­it­ed for many decades. The arrival of the rail­way to the region made some things eas­i­er. But the resource itself was not quite so free and easy (Fig. 11) as first depict­ed. Com­mod­i­fi­ca­tion of the resource required new meth­ods of sep­a­ra­tion of oil from the sands that would take decades to evolve, damp­en­ing this ear­ly enthusiasm.

Fig. 11  Sid­ney Ells, Work­ing Face of Bitu­mi­nous Sands

Political Handfuls of Tar

Rail­ways were cru­cial to the Cana­di­an extrac­tive econ­o­my. In the ear­ly 1900s busi­ness pres­sure mount­ed for the Cana­di­an and Alber­ta Gov­ern­ments to sup­port rail­way expan­sion west­wards and north­wards. Zaslow notes that ini­tial­ly “the oil boom [in 1910 in the tar-sands lands] quick­ly fad­ed… but while it last­ed, it strong­ly affect­ed the rail­way pro­gram of the Alber­ta Gov­ern­ment” includ­ing their com­mit­ment to the pro­posed Alber­ta and Great Water­ways rail line to join Edmon­ton to Fort McMur­ray (212). Finan­cial issues asso­ci­at­ed with its devel­op­ment would force a gov­ern­ment res­ig­na­tion and a new elec­tion in 1910, but the rail line reached Drap­er in 1922 (12 kilo­me­ters south of McMur­ray) and McMur­ray in 1925-26. Alber­ta devel­oped con­sid­er­able pub­lic debt build­ing north­ern trans­porta­tion and com­mu­ni­ca­tion (Richards and Pratt 19-20). Images of well-dressed men, with hand­fuls of tar, repeat across the visu­al record of this time. This first image (Fig. 12) includes right to left: S.E. Merci­er, North­ern Con­struc­tion Com­pa­ny; Hon V.W. Smith, Min­is­ter of Rail­ways; Alber­ta Pre­mier Her­bert Green­field; and Colonel Jim Corn­wall, North­ern Trans­porta­tion Com­pa­ny. Green­field, Smith and the Unit­ed Farm­ers of Alber­ta par­ty were first elect­ed that year, the pow­er­ful hands of pol­i­tics and pub­lic trans­porta­tion along­side those of pri­vate finance at the tar sands in ear­ly 1921.

Fig. 12  Oil Sands - ½ mile north of Fort McMurray

Men in urban busi­ness attire out in nature (Fig. 12) sug­gest the easy avail­abil­i­ty, access, and abun­dance of the resource and the appar­ent ease of its poten­tial extrac­tion. Edmon­ton busi­ness men, in dress clothes and fash­ion­able urban head­gear (Fig. 13), col­lect­ing hand­fuls of tar sands or dip­ping into liq­uid tar pools (Fig. 14), sent a mes­sage about the rich­es of this place as a kind of repos­i­to­ry of black gold.

Fig. 13  Oil Sat­u­rat­ed Stones Exam­ined by a Group of Edmon­ton Busi­ness Men

Fig. 14.  Robert Fitzsim­mons, Uniden­ti­fied Man Check­ing out a Sur­face Pool of Bitumen

Fig. 15  Group Exam­in­ing Tar Sands, Fort McMur­ray, Alber­ta. Left to Right: Wal­ter Jewitt, Ted Nagle, Bill McDonald.

The arrival of well-dressed men at the tar sands sug­gests the com­ing of com­mer­cial invest­ment to the region (Fig. 13-15). Along­side reports of the mile-by-mile approach of the rail­way, such images no doubt encour­aged dis­tant publics, share­hold­ers and the state. But the images also spoke to a dif­fi­cult prob­lem: how to sep­a­rate out the oil from the sands and the need for invest­ment in the process of extrac­tion. The next stage in this process was to bring such visions to fruition through science.

Fig. 16  Ruther­ford Caley, Man Look­ing at Oil Flow­ing Freely from Tar Sands Exposed to Heat of Sun

Karl Clark: Geographic Sites of Science

The trans­porta­tion costs to move heavy and unwieldy bitu­mi­nous sands to mar­ket height­ened the need for an indus­tri­al process to con­vert bitu­men into a liq­uid form that could flow south­wards for com­mer­cial use and prof­it. But bitumen’s spe­cial mate­r­i­al conditions—it was dense, heavy, and mixed with sand, water, oth­er chem­i­cals, and clays—meant that large invest­ments in sci­ence would need to be inject­ed for an exten­sive peri­od of time before any returns on those invest­ments would begin to flow. No process to sep­a­rate the oil from the tar sands appeared to work well at an indus­tri­al scale, although many images (Fig. 17) record home­spun efforts at separation.

Fig. 17  Daniel Div­er, Inte­ri­or of Shack with Sam­ple of Tar Sands and Extrac­tions, Fort McMur­ray. Remarks: “Pail on stove holds tar sands, bot­tle shows oil and a milk like sub­stance. Gas comes from tube at oth­er end. 8 pounds, sand pro­duces 12 oun­zes, oil; 6000 poundss, sand pro­duce 1 pound bitu­min (sic).”

One of those whose per­se­ver­ance would pre­vail was Dr. Karl Clark, a Uni­ver­si­ty of Alber­ta sci­en­tist, and employ­ee of the provin­cial­ly-sup­port­ed Research Coun­cil of Alber­ta (found­ed in 1921 with the ini­tial pur­pose of pur­su­ing indus­tri­al­iza­tion of the Athabas­ca sands). Clark is cred­it­ed with devel­op­ing a hot water sep­a­ra­tion method in 1926. Over many years, Clark moved his research back and forth from uni­ver­si­ty lab­o­ra­to­ry to Edmon­ton ware­house yards to wilder­ness workshop.

Fig. 18  McDer­mid Stu­dios Edmon­ton, Dr. Karl Clark, Uni­ver­si­ty of Alber­ta, Tar Sands Department.

Images like that of the sci­en­tist at work (Fig. 18), lab coat stained in oil, affirmed Clark’s efforts at applied sci­ence. Clark’s work in the field brought increased author­i­ty to his lab­o­ra­to­ry sci­ence at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Alber­ta and to the government’s Alber­ta Research Coun­cil, and vice ver­sa. Pilot plants were built in Edmon­ton and the Dun­ve­g­an rail yards (Fig. 19) in 1924 and rebuilt in 1929 (Fer­gu­son 191 and 53-54).

Fig. 19 D. S. Paster­nack, Oil Sands Extrac­tion Plants- Edmon­ton Dun­ve­g­an Yards. At the behest of the Pre­mier and a new joint Fed­er­al and Provin­cial Bitu­mi­nous Sands Advi­so­ry Com­mit­tee, Clark then estab­lished a plant in Fort McMur­ray on the banks of the Clear­wa­ter Riv­er (Fig. 20) in late 1929.

Fig. 20  D. S. Paster­nack, Oil Extrac­tion Plant - Clear­wa­ter Riv­er Plant. The plant processed 800 tons of oil sands in the sum­mer of 1930, and yield­ed over 75 tons of bitu­men (Fer­gu­son 54).

While the end goal was com­mer­cial invest­ment and prof­it, the sci­en­tif­ic chal­lenge itself appeared to be a strong source of enthu­si­asm. Bar­ry Fer­gu­son argues that “the fact that the Pre­mier him­self was chair­man [of the Research Coun­cil of Alber­ta] and that the board includ­ed both cab­i­net min­is­ters and the Uni­ver­si­ty Pres­i­dent” indi­cates its impor­tance (52). Whether inten­tion­al or not, sci­en­tif­ic and tech­no­log­i­cal prob­lem solv­ing brought a dose of hero­ism to the process that often obscured the ulti­mate ends—which were always com­mer­cial exploita­tion. Images of bush lab­o­ra­to­ries con­firmed that lab exper­i­ments and process­es could be adapt­ed to the ter­rain and cli­mat­ic con­di­tions. This visu­al­ly-con­veyed pres­ence on the land was cru­cial to legit­i­mat­ing Clark’s work, and to attract­ing future com­mer­cial invest­ment to the tar sands. Sep­a­ra­tion was shown to work in nature: that is, in “real” con­di­tions albeit at a mod­er­ate scale. Field exper­i­ments brought with them the pow­er­ful author­i­ty of sci­ence and the uni­ver­si­ty, and con­firmed a sep­a­ra­tion process based on uni­ver­sal prin­ci­ples of chem­istry. In Putting Sci­ence in Its Place, Liv­ing­stone argues that the loca­tion of where sci­ence is car­ried out adds to its claims. Clark’s strong pres­ence, at a time when sci­ence was revered, fur­ther increased pub­lic accep­tance of gov­ern­ment tak­ing a role in the indus­try by using tax­pay­ers’ mon­ey for research and infra­struc­ture, while at the same time reas­sur­ing the even­tu­al pri­vate investors need­ed for com­mer­cial scale pro­duc­tion (Fer­gu­son 31-58).

Early Commercial Uses - Asphalt

The arrival of the Alber­ta and Great Water­ways rail line to south McMur­ray and Water­ways made it pos­si­ble to trans­port heavy machin­ery for use in com­mer­cial sep­a­ra­tion exper­i­ments north­wards, and to ship large amounts of bitu­men south. But sep­a­ra­tion would not come until the late 1920s, and com­mer­cial scale extrac­tion still much lat­er. In the mean­time, Ells and Clark and both gov­ern­ments were under pres­sure to demon­strate return on pub­lic invest­ment in sci­ence and infrastructure.

A num­ber of high pro­file exper­i­ments took place. Ells, on behalf of the fed­er­al Depart­ment of Mines, describes pack­ing tar sands by dog or Abo­rig­i­nal and Métis labour track­ing scows south on the Athabas­ca riv­er (Fig. 21), and lat­er by train (Fig. 22) to pave roads and side­walks on Jasper Avenue in the com­mer­cial heart of the cap­i­tal in Edmon­ton (Fig. 23), sur­face approach­es to the new Alber­ta Leg­is­la­ture (see the Alber­ta leg­is­la­ture paving image in Hunt 347), and to pave approach­es to Jasper Park Lodge, a fed­er­al land­scape (Fig. 24). In its nat­ur­al state, bare­ly reworked, bitu­mi­nous sands proved a use­able surface.

Fig. 21  Sid­ney Ells, Men Car­ry­ing Sacks of Bitu­mi­nous Sands as Ship­ment Pass­es Cas­cade Rapids, Athabas­ca Riv­er, Alberta.

Fig. 22 McDer­mid Stu­dios Edmon­ton, Alber­ta Tar Sands Grand Trunk Pacif­ic Rail Car

Fig. 23  Robert Fitzsim­mons, Exper­i­men­tal Pave­ment Laid with Alber­ta Bitu­mi­nous Sand under Direc­tion of Mines Branch, Depart­ment of Mines.

Fig. 24  Sid­ney Ells, Walk­ways at Jasper Park Lodge Sur­faced with Bitu­mi­nous Sand, Jasper, Alberta.

Bill­boards that announced train cars of tar sands in Edmon­ton or its use in fed­er­al gov­ern­ment paving exper­i­ments, no doubt some­what jus­ti­fied the pub­lic invest­ment in map­ping, research, and the rail line to McMur­ray. And high pro­file ‘exper­i­ments’ at the Alber­ta Leg­is­la­ture and at the fed­er­al­ly con­trolled Jasper Park Lodge sym­bol­i­cal­ly linked each com­pet­ing lev­el of gov­ern­ment to the resources future. The Domin­ion of Cana­da would con­trol the Athabas­ca tar sands region for the Crown until Alber­ta took con­trol of its nat­ur­al resources in 1930. Even then, the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment retained tar sands leas­es in the McMur­ray area until 1945, indi­cat­ing fed­er­al pri­or­i­ties for the resource. Both gov­ern­ments would lat­er play a role in co-fund­ing Syn­crude in the Lougheed era (1971-1982). The high pro­file of the exper­i­ments res­onates with many cur­rent cor­po­rate and gov­ern­ment pro­mo­tions that extol pub­licly fund­ed uni­ver­si­ty sci­ence and its role in clean­ing up the industry.

Commercial Scale Experiments

Between the 1930s and the 1940s, two impor­tant, pri­vate­ly-fund­ed com­mer­cial projects—International Bitu­men fol­lowed by Abasand Oil—emerged, and failed. Images of these pio­neer com­mer­cial plants (e.g., Fig. 25 and 26) are sprin­kled through­out Cana­di­an his­to­ry books, invok­ing pride for the indus­tri­ous­ness of com­mer­cial pio­neers on the tar sands frontier.

Fig. 25  Robert Fitzsim­mons, Ear­ly Process of Liq­ue­fy­ing Bitumen

Fig. 26. Robert Fitzsim­mons, Inter­na­tion­al Bitu­men Com­pa­ny Lim­it­ed. Uniden­ti­fied men using ear­ly process in liquify­ing bitumen.

Robert Fitzsim­mons’ efforts in the 1930s are described as ama­teur and pro­mo­tion­al, but they also caused a con­ta­gious “fever of belief” among his fol­low­ers. Fer­gu­son (85) describes the hyp­not­ic effect of the tar sands on engi­neers and sci­en­tists who worked with Fitzsim­mons to try to make sep­a­ra­tion and pro­duc­tion com­mer­cial­ly viable, but by 1939, just nine years after con­struc­tion, the Inter­na­tion­al Bitu­men plant, was con­sid­ered “worth­less” and con­signed to the dust­bins of indus­tri­al history.

Fig. 27  Robert C. Fitzsim­mons, Tar Sands Build­ing Edmon­ton; View of Exte­ri­or of Build­ing Locat­ed at 5338-126 Avenue in Edmon­ton, Alberta.

This pho­to­graph of the Fitzsim­mons Tar Sands Build­ing under con­struc­tion in Edmon­ton (Fig. 27) sug­gests his opti­mism and cer­tain­ly would have added to the pub­lic ‘fever’ around the busi­ness. Even today, snazzy head offices of tar sands com­pa­nies have impor­tant sym­bol­ic value.

Fig. 28  Macken­zie Air Ser­vice, Aer­i­al View Look­ing North of Abasand Oils Ltd.,Horse Riv­er, Fort McMur­ray, Alta.

The Abasand Oil plant began oper­a­tions in 1936 (Fig. 28), and was con­sid­ered a vast improve­ment over Fitzsim­mons’ ear­li­er efforts, con­struct­ed under the guid­ance of Max Ball, an Amer­i­can engi­neer. The Abasand plant took years to devel­op and test, and images of it give the impres­sion of a pro­fes­sion­al and tech­ni­cal­ly sophis­ti­cat­ed indus­tri­al enter­prise. The plant began to pro­duce petro­le­um prod­ucts of var­i­ous kinds in 1941 but was destroyed by fire in Novem­ber of that year, nev­er reach­ing its “design capac­i­ty of 3000 bar­rels of bitu­men per day,” attain­ing on aver­age 400 bar­rels of oil per day in the sum­mer of 1941, although it did prove extrac­tion could be effec­tive (Fer­gu­son 204). Two key fac­tors were com­mon to both of these com­mer­cial ven­tures: “they fol­lowed paths beat­en by gov­ern­ment researchers” like Clark, and they required “advanced tech­ni­cal exper­tise and large sums of mon­ey if com­mer­cial devel­op­ment was to be suc­cess­ful” (Fer­gu­son 94).

Faced with fuel short­ages dur­ing World War II, at a time when Cana­da pro­duced only five per­cent of the oil it con­sumed, the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment decid­ed to res­ur­rect the fail­ing Abasand project and start­ed recon­struc­tion in 1943. A num­ber of fed­er­al inves­ti­ga­tors car­ried out a series of stud­ies to iden­ti­fy prob­lems with Ball’s engi­neer­ing, plant design, and oper­a­tions, and the tech­ni­cal changes need­ed to guar­an­tee com­mer­cial poten­tial of the tar sands, includ­ing the need to upscale the plant in size (Fer­gu­son 93). The Fed­er­al Depart­ment of Mines, with Syd­ney Ells at the helm, took the lead finan­cial role, although some pri­vate Cana­di­an mon­ey remained in play. They moved the oper­a­tion to a lease hold con­trolled by Ottawa (orig­i­nal­ly scout­ed by Ells) con­tain­ing rich­er deposits of tar and expand­ed the project to 4,000 bar­rels of bitu­men a day. Alber­ta was wary of the project, fear­ing a fed­er­al takeover of the resource. Var­i­ous authors report the lack of col­lab­o­ra­tion between fed­er­al and provin­cial spe­cial­ists and sci­en­tists, includ­ing Ells and Clark.

These Abasand images were pho­tographed by geol­o­gist George Sher­wood Hume (Fig. 29 and 30). He record­ed many images of Abasand dur­ing a series of vis­its in the 1940s.[3]

Hume start­ed work for the Geo­log­i­cal Sur­vey of Cana­da in 1921 and at the time of Abasand would have been con­sid­ered the Cana­di­an gov­ern­ment expert on petro­le­um explo­ration and resources. Dur­ing the Sec­ond World War he was advi­sor to the oil con­troller for Cana­da, and lat­er he became chief of the Bureau of Geol­o­gy in 1947. In 1949 he became direc­tor of the Mines, Forests, and Sci­en­tif­ic Ser­vices branch of the Depart­ment of Mines and Resources and act­ing Deputy Min­is­ter of Mines.

Fig. 29  George Sher­wood Hume, Abasand Plant.

Fig. 30  George Sher­wood Hume, Abasand Plant.

Hume’s first two pho­tographs (Fig. 29 and 30) pro­vide a per­spec­tive that shows the scale of the indus­tri­al oper­a­tion; its loca­tion on the edge of a wood­ed area, apart from, yet a part of, a land­scape dom­i­nat­ed by the sur­round­ing bore­al forest.

Fig. 31. George Sher­wood Hume, Abasand Plant along­side Horse Riv­er. Note cribs for waste sands.

This third image (Fig. 31) shows the rela­tion­ship of min­ing pit and extrac­tion plants to the Horse Riv­er and includes one of the few images of ear­ly waste tail­ings ponds. The reliance on prox­im­i­ty to water for the sep­a­ra­tion process­es is clear. The pipe cross­es the riv­er to out­flow ponds that fore­shad­ow con­tem­po­rary waste tail­ings impacts on land­scapes and ecosys­tems, but the scale of future projects remains unimag­in­able. In the end, the project was a spec­tac­u­lar fail­ure, and again burned down in 1945. Accord­ing to Chastko, “the sim­mer­ing con­flict between the two groups allowed the oil­sands issue to become sub­sumed with­in the fed­er­al-provin­cial bat­tle­ground over nat­ur­al resource devel­op­ment” (54).

Dur­ing the Abasand years lead­ing up to and dur­ing World War II, grow­ing fears of the scarci­ty of oil sup­ply boost­ed gov­ern­ment and pub­lic enthu­si­asm and sup­port for tar sands research and devel­op­ment. That con­text of fear altered after a large con­ven­tion­al oil deposit was dis­cov­ered at Leduc in 1947. The use of ener­gy secu­ri­ty dis­cours­es would re-appear in the 1970s dur­ing the first oil cri­sis, and once again in the con­tem­po­rary post 9-11 era, the lat­ter peri­od infused with ener­gy and polit­i­cal secu­ri­ty alike (David­son and Gis­mon­di 159).

Bitumont: Success at Last

Fig. 32  Aer­i­al View of Provin­cial Government’s Pilot Plant for Extract­ing Oil from North­ern Alber­ta Tar Sands, Bitu­mont, Alberta

To main­tain the inter­est of pri­vate investors in the tar sands, the Alber­ta gov­ern­ment fund­ed the build­ing of Bitu­mont, a large-scale pilot sep­a­ra­tion plant in 1946 and 1947, near the site of the old Fitzsim­mons plant (Fig. 32). It was re-designed by Amer­i­can engi­neers under the super­vi­sion of Karl Clark’s col­league Syd­ney Blair; its pur­pose once again to prove com­mer­cial via­bil­i­ty. The plant oper­at­ed for two sea­sons, begin­ning in the sum­mer of 1948, and inter­mit­tent­ly there­after for anoth­er decade, at a total cost to Alber­ta tax­pay­ers of about one mil­lion dol­lars over the life­time of the plant. (In com­par­i­son, the entire 1953-54 Alber­ta bud­get was $53 mil­lion.) Employ­ing Clark’s hot water method, it only pro­duced 500 bar­rels of bitu­men a day, but “proved via­bil­i­ty of the sep­a­ra­tion process and bitu­men pro­duc­tion” (Fer­gu­son 209–211).

Fig. 33  Dr. Karl Clark who has been in charge of the bitu­mi­nous sands project since 1920. Bitu­mont Plant.

The size of these plants is minis­cule com­pared to today’s scales. But aer­i­al images of pro­fes­sion­al­ly engi­neered pro­duc­tion plants on the edge of the bore­al wilder­ness instilled con­fi­dence in the progress by the state and cor­po­ra­tions, espe­cial­ly when con­trast­ed with ear­ly images of boil­ing pots of oil and slip­shod sys­tems of min­ing and sep­a­ra­tion. This 1949 pho­to of Karl Clark at the Bitu­mont plant depicts a gen­tle­man sci­en­tist, in his com­fort­able old sweater, pipe in hand, stand­ing in front of the fruits of his research (Fig. 33). Clark looks more like he has just risen from his easy chair beside a fire­place, pro­vid­ing a cer­tain pub­lic reas­sur­ance that the tar sands have arrived, nature at last tamed by sci­ence and indus­tri­ous­ness. Clark would attend the sod turn­ing of the Great Cana­di­an Oil Sands in 1965, but died some months before it went into oper­a­tions. How­ev­er, in con­trast to the reas­sur­ing sym­bol his image rep­re­sent­ed, Mary Clark Shep­pard would lat­er write in her biog­ra­phy of her father that he had a deep respect for nature and, at the end of his life, was sad­dened to see the scale of min­ing and pro­cess­ing required at the GCOS plant (89). Nev­er­the­less, today, vis­i­tors to Alber­ta can vis­it the Alber­ta Research Coun­cil on Dr. Karl Clark Road, Edmon­ton or the Dr. Karl Clark School in Fort McMurray.

In 1974, the Bitu­mont site, locat­ed 89 km north of Fort McMur­ray, was des­ig­nat­ed an Alber­ta his­tor­i­cal site. The state­ment of his­tor­i­cal sig­nif­i­cance by Alber­ta His­tor­i­cal Resources staff (“Bitu­mont Site,” Canada’s His­toric Places) affirms:

The her­itage val­ue of Bitu­mont lies in its asso­ci­a­tion with the attempts of the provin­cial gov­ern­ment, pri­vate indi­vid­u­als, and oil com­pa­nies to devel­op meth­ods of prof­itably extract­ing oil from north­ern Alberta's tar sands. The hot water sep­a­ra­tion process pio­neered at Bitu­mont estab­lished the eco­nom­ic via­bil­i­ty of the tar sands and laid the foun­da­tions for future exploita­tion of this valu­able resource.… Although Bitu­mont was aban­doned in the late 1950s, the research and tech­nol­o­gy asso­ci­at­ed with the site has had an endur­ing impact upon Alberta's oil indus­try. Through the efforts of gov­ern­ment agen­cies and pri­vate com­pa­nies at the site, the Athabas­ca oil sands were estab­lished as a viable com­mer­cial endeav­our, paving the way for the cre­ation of the mas­sive Sun­cor and Syn­crude oil sands plants.

The approval by the Alber­ta Gov­ern­ment of Bitu­mont as a Provin­cial Her­itage site did more than pre­serve some rem­nants of old indus­tri­al build­ings; it filled the place with mean­ing, inte­grat­ing the sto­ry of the indus­try into the offi­cial his­to­ry of Alberta’s province build­ing. Osborne argues that in the cul­ture of nation-build­ing, cer­tain Cana­di­an geo­graph­ic land­scapes have become sym­bol­i­cal­ly invest­ed (like civic mon­u­ments) with his­tor­i­cal mean­ing, woven into social mem­o­ry and, in our case, inter­nal­ized as part of the Alber­ta identity.

Great Canadian Oil Sands Company 1967

Fig. 34  Heavy Machin­ery Used at Athabas­ca Tar Sands.

If Karl Clark in his lat­er years expressed alarm at the scale of destruc­tion that ensued, his con­cern was eas­i­ly drowned out by the ‘wow’ fac­tor expressed by visu­als of the mas­sive machin­ery dwarf­ing humans and devour­ing land­scapes (Fig. 34-35). Gov­ern­ment and com­mer­cial pro­mot­ers of the tar sands indus­try in the 1960s and 1970s would cel­e­brate this immen­si­ty; images of giant buck­et-wheels or draglines became sell­ing fea­tures to the pub­lic, sym­bol­iz­ing the enor­mi­ty of chal­lenges over­come. As Berg­er says, “noth­ing is acci­den­tal in an image,” and visu­al depic­tions of the tar sands devel­op­ments con­vey scale, per­haps more than any oth­er mes­sage (Fig. 34-36). Pho­to-jour­nal­ist shots of giant machines worked along­side of dis­cours­es about the immen­si­ty of the resource, the jobs, and the wealth to keep the scale of destruc­tion at bay, dis­placed by the won­der of huge tech­nolo­gies. In No Cap­tion Need­ed, Hari­man and Lucaites argue that icon­ic images like the buck­et wheel (Fig. 35-36) rep­re­sent unspo­ken civic virtues asso­ci­at­ed with an his­toric event (109, 126, 129). With the cel­e­bra­tions sur­round­ing the suc­cess of the Great Cana­di­an Oil Sands in Canada’s cen­ten­ni­al year (1967), those civic virtues reached the world stage.

Fig. 35  Fort McMurray—Great Cana­di­an Tar Sands Project.

Fig. 36  Heavy Machin­ery Used at Athabas­ca Tar Sands.

A dig­i­ti­za­tion of a film of the open­ing of the plant in 1967, uploaded to YouTube by Sun­cor Ener­gy in 2010, cap­tures the pride of those work­ers who built the GCOS plant, and also records Alberta’s Pre­mier Man­ning ded­i­cat­ing the new plant “not mere­ly to pro­duc­tion of oil but to the con­tin­u­al progress and enrich­ment of mankind.” GCOS repro­duced the buck­et-wheel image (Fig. 37) on com­mem­o­ra­tive medals in 1975 (on the tenth anniver­sary of pub­lic deben­tures pur­chased by over 100,000 Alber­tans to sus­tain the com­pa­ny), and in 1978 the Gov­ern­ment of Cana­da and Cana­da Post cre­at­ed a stamp of the Athabas­ca Tar Sands (Fig. 38), hon­our­ing the indus­try in both offi­cial languages.

Fig. 37  Pio­neer­ing Ener­gy Togeth­er Great Cana­di­an Oil Sands Medal­lion (1975).

The Medal­lions appeared in a blue sleeve with this text:

Ten years ago, through the pur­chase of Great Cana­di­an Deben­tures, you and more than 100,000 oth­er Alber­tans joined with The Great Cana­di­an Oil Sands Lim­it­ed and Sun Oil Com­pa­ny in the cre­ation of the world's first oil sand mine. You have helped pio­neer a very dif­fi­cult ven­ture that today stands as a mile­stone in real­iz­ing the poten­tial of this unique Alber­ta resource. In com­mem­o­ra­tion we have com­mis­sioned the spe­cial mint­ing of an orig­i­nal medal­lion: Pio­neer­ing Ener­gy Together—1975. We hope that you will val­ue this medal­lion as a gift of our sin­cere appre­ci­a­tion of your faith and con­fi­dence in the Great Cana­di­an Oil Sands. Your role has been an impor­tant one—Your par­tic­i­pa­tion Historic.

The word­ing remind­ed all Alber­tans of their con­nec­tions to the indus­try as co-founders who had invest­ed both dol­lars and cer­tain amount of provin­cial pride.

Fig. 38  Cana­da Post Cor­po­ra­tion, Athabas­ca Tar Sands Stamp, 1978.

Accord­ing to Raen­to and Brunn stamps act like polit­i­cal mes­sen­gers; illus­tra­tions that take images to a wider audi­ence and per­form much like social texts that offer ide­o­log­i­cal “read­ings” of a ter­ri­to­ry or project (145). Often over­looked as part of visu­al cul­ture, stamps pro­mote nation­al iden­ti­ty with what Raen­to and Brunn call “banal nation­al­ism.” In 1978 this stamp added a pleas­ing aes­thet­ic and artis­tic qual­i­ty to the buck­et­wheel at work, exhibit­ing enor­mi­ty yet dimin­ish­ing per­cep­tions of envi­ron­men­tal impacts. Today “Cyrus,” the 850 tonne buck­et­wheel exca­va­tor, has been retired to the out­door muse­um at the Oil Sands Dis­cov­ery Cen­tre in Fort McMur­ray, “one of the largest land based arti­facts in Cana­da.” While the buck­et­wheels were sur­passed by the giant truck and shov­el tech­nolo­gies in the 1990s, Cyrus stands on guard as his­tor­i­cal icon, both ‘live’ and on this social media pho­tog­ra­phy website.

Continuities: Visual Threads, Ideological Mainstays

Images of the tar sands dif­fer from the usu­al oil der­ricks, drilling rigs, and pump jacks asso­ci­at­ed with the glob­al oil indus­try. Tar sands petro­cul­ture is non-con­ven­tion­al, just like the non-con­ven­tion­al oil it pro­duces. The indus­try has had more in com­mon with the mas­sive­ly destruc­tive open-pit min­ing and smelt­ing cul­tures of North Amer­i­ca than the con­ven­tion­al Alber­ta oil indus­try (LeCain). In this paper we intro­duced a series of his­tor­i­cal Athabas­ca tar sands images to illus­trate how rep­re­sen­ta­tions oper­at­ed at var­i­ous stages in the growth of this spec­u­la­tive eco­nom­ic and tech­no­log­i­cal under­tak­ing by the Alber­ta state.

We unearthed traces of sci­en­tism and tech­nol­o­gism, of mas­culin­i­ty and fron­tierism, of nature and soci­ety dual­ism, of dom­i­nant and exclud­ed gazes, of scale and invis­i­bil­i­ty, of icon­ic images and exhi­bi­tionary com­plex­es, par­tic­u­lar to the social con­struc­tion of the his­tor­i­cal imag­i­nary of the indus­try well into the late 1980s. Our inter­est in doing so was nei­ther anti­quar­i­an, nor pure­ly his­tor­i­cal. As glob­al soci­ety faces peak oil and declin­ing rates of sup­ply of con­ven­tion­al oil, non-con­ven­tion­al oil is being looked to solve present and future ener­gy short­ages. The eco­log­i­cal, entrop­ic and polit­i­cal con­tra­dic­tions of glob­al expan­sion into non-con­ven­tion­al oil are the focus of a more com­plex cri­tique in our work Chal­leng­ing Legit­i­ma­cy at the Precipe of Ener­gy Calami­ty (2011). But what struck us in that work is that many of these old­er images and tra­di­tion­al mes­sages (i.e. sci­ence can solve all prob­lems, and prob­lems in nature can be engi­neered away) attached to them cir­cu­late still today, used in new ways to rep­re­sent and nar­rate ‘past and present process­es’ of province build­ing and the nat­ur­al evo­lu­tion of sci­ence, tech­nol­o­gy and dis­cov­ery in the indus­try. Mov­ing out from the archives, these images cir­cu­late in cor­po­rate and gov­ern­ment oil sands pub­lic­i­ty and Alber­ta her­itage and cul­ture sites: “the same pho­to­graph circulat[ing] in time and space, between his­tor­i­cal doc­u­ment and for­mal exper­i­ment, from mass media to curat­ed exhi­bi­tion” (Gabara 140, 167). Oth­ers have become insti­tu­tion­al­ized in what Ben­nett called “exhi­bi­tionary com­plex­es” like the Oil Sands Dis­cov­ery Cen­tre (OSDC, estab­lished and run by the Alber­ta Gov­ern­ment since 1985), “vehi­cles for inscrib­ing and broad­cast­ing the mes­sages of pow­er […] through­out soci­ety.” At the OSDC, trendy design­ers inte­grate hun­dreds of her­itage images into dis­plays of cur­rent min­ing and extrac­tion prac­tices to nor­mal­ize the step by step growth of the indus­try, shown twice dai­ly in films like “Pay Dirt – Alberta’s Oil Sands: Cen­turies in the Mak­ing,” a 45-minute “doc­u­men­tary” viewed by thou­sands of school chil­dren and their fam­i­lies annu­al­ly at the inter­pre­tive cen­tre, com­plete with online teacher’s guide. The scale of envi­ron­men­tal con­se­quences, while acknowl­edged, is resist­ed with appeals to that black and white his­to­ry of cor­po­rate and gov­ern­ment col­lab­o­ra­tion to find tech­no­log­i­cal solutions.

Such overt legit­i­ma­cy work has been called into ques­tion in part by a series of con­tem­po­rary pho­to­graph­ic com­po­si­tions that broke through the con­trolled cor­po­rate and state images avail­able, to offer sel­dom-seen views of the indus­tri­al impacts of tar sands extrac­tion and devel­op­ment. Because of the cir­cu­lat­ing capac­i­ty of the Inter­net, a glob­al flow of stills and videos of the extent of indus­tri­al oper­a­tions and its eco­log­i­cal impacts now move at dif­fer­ent polit­i­cal scales and among dif­fer­ent publics—Don van Hout’s per­son­al canoe jour­ney down the Athabas­ca Riv­er in 2007; Louis Helbig’s aer­i­al pho­tog­ra­phy shot from his own air­plane as he flew above tar sands oper­a­tions; the work of Mag­num pho­tog­ra­phers Jonas Bendik­sen and Alex Webb; Peter Essick’s Nation­al Geo­graph­ic shoot; or the indus­tri­al land­scape pho­tog­ra­phy of Edward Bur­tyn­sky and his world-renowned study The End of Oil with wide scale images of Alberta’s tar sands oper­a­tions promi­nent in the exhib­it. Avail­able exten­sive­ly on social media sites, these and oth­er pho­to­graph­ic and mov­ing images inform world­wide crit­i­cal oppo­si­tion­al discourses.

But the effec­tive­ness of that cri­tique for build­ing a pol­i­tics or move­ment of change, despite its glob­al reach, is aggres­sive­ly resist­ed by both the Alber­ta (and now the Cana­di­an fed­er­al) state and the glob­al oil indus­try. Local and nation­al crit­i­cism, while at times strong in some pro­gres­sive sec­tors, remains mut­ed by a boom­ing Alber­ta econ­o­my, and con­tem­po­rary dis­cours­es about secu­ri­ty of sup­ply. One essen­tial ele­ment ever present in the mul­ti-lay­ered strate­gies of sup­port­ers of the indus­try, is this com­pli­cat­ed old­er set of cul­tur­al and her­itage imag­i­nar­ies of the indus­try, which com­prise an endur­ing, if con­test­ed, ele­ment of sub­jec­tiv­i­ty among Alber­tans and Cana­di­ans, includ­ing the social iden­ti­ty of the province. Like Canada’s prob­lem­at­ic nation­al iden­ti­ty as a nat­ur­al resource exporter, such images of hero­ic extrac­tion linger, act­ing like ‘‘buried epis­te­molo­gies” (Braun 3) that con­fuse and thwart cur­rent pub­lic think­ing about eco­log­i­cal, eth­i­cal, and polit­i­cal alter­na­tives to the tar sands.

Image Notes

Fig. 1  Dowl­ing, G.B.. Geo­log­i­cal Sur­vey of Cana­da; Tar Sands Athabas­ca Riv­er, Alta. 1892. Pho­to­graph. PA-038166, 1892. Library and Archives Cana­da, Ottawa.

Fig. 2. Rob­son Stu­dio Hammerstein’s Oil Works. Oil and Gas Well, Athabas­ca Dis­trict. 1905. Pho­to­graph. MIKAN 3524914. Library and Archives Cana­da, Ottawa.

Fig. 3. Von Ham­mer­stein, Alfred. Tar Sands and Flow­ing Asphal­tum in the Athabas­ca Dis­trict. c1908. Pho­to­graph. PA-029259. Library and Archives Cana­da, Ottawa.

Fig. 4.  Oil Sand Expo­sure Near Fort McMur­ray. N.d. Pho­to­graph. PAA 77.178/22. Provin­cial Archives of Alber­ta, Edmonton.

Fig. 5. Ells, Roy. Dr. Sid­ney Ells at Fort McMur­ray Tar Sands. 1928. Pho­to­graph. PAA A12023. Provin­cial Archives of Alber­ta, Edmonton.

Fig. 6. Ells, Sid­ney. Bitu­mi­nous Sand; Grand Rapids, Athabas­ca Riv­er Dis­trict. 1913. Pho­to­graph. MIKAN 3373021. Library and Archives Cana­da, Ottawa.

Fig. 7  Ells, Sid­ney. Ter­race Struc­ture, Athabas­ca Riv­er. 1913. Pho­to­graph. MIKAN 3373027. Library and Archives Cana­da, Ottawa.

Fig. 8. Ells, Sid­ney. Steep­bank Riv­er. 1923. Pho­to­graph. MIKAN3373204. Library and Archives Cana­da, Ottawa.

Fig. 9. Clark, Karl. Pack­ing dogs with Tar Sands, Ells Riv­er. c1925. Pho­to­graph. PAA A5560. Provin­cial Archives of Alber­ta. Edmonton.

Fig. 10. Spence, H. S. Syd­ney Ells at Tar Sands Plant. 1931. Pho­to­graph. MIKAN 3215356. Library and Archives Cana­da, Ottawa.

Fig. 11.  Ells, Sid­ney. Work­ing Face of Bitu­mi­nous Sands. 1927. Pho­to­graph. MIKAN 3193674. Library and Archives Cana­da, Ottawa.

Fig. 12  Oil Sands - ½ Mile North of Fort McMur­ray. 1921. Pho­to­graph. Pho­to A 3344. Provin­cial Archives of Alber­ta, Edmonton.

Fig. 13. Oil Sat­u­rat­ed Stones Exam­ined by a Group of Edmon­ton Busi­ness Men. N.d. Pho­to­graph. PAA B1067. Provin­cial Archives of Alber­ta, Edmonton.

Fig. 14. Fitzsim­mons, Robert. Uniden­ti­fied Man Check­ing out a Sur­face Pool of Bitu­men. N.d. Pho­to­graph. PAA A. 3381. Provin­cial Archives of Alber­ta, Edmonton.

Fig. 15 Group Exam­in­ing Tar Sands, Fort McMur­ray, Alber­ta. 1927. Pho­to­graph. PD 356-311. Glen­bow Archives, Calgary.

Fig. 16  Caley, Ruther­ford. Man Look­ing at Oil Flow­ing Freely from Tar Sands Exposed to Heat of Sun. N.d. Pho­to­graph. A12182 Provin­cial Archives of Alber­ta, Edmonton.

Fig. 17  Div­er, Daniel. Inte­ri­or of Shack with Sam­ple of Tar Sands and Extrac­tions. Fort McMur­ray. 1920. Pho­to­graph. NA-1142-6. Glen­bow Archives, Calgary.

Fig. 18. McDer­mid Stu­dios Edmon­ton. Dr. Karl Clark, Uni­ver­si­ty of Alber­ta, Tar Sands Depart­ment. 1929. Pho­to­graph. ND-3-4596c. Glen­bow Archives, Calgary.

Fig. 19  Paster­nack, D. S. Oil Sands Extrac­tion Plants- Edmon­ton Dun­ve­g­an Yards. Provin­cial Archives of Alber­ta, Edmon­ton. Pho­to­graph. A11233, 1924-25).

Fig. 20  Paster­nack, D. S. Oil Extrac­tion Plant - Clear­wa­ter Riv­er Plant. c1930. Pho­to­graph. PAA 11223. Provin­cial Archives of Alber­ta, Edmonton.

Fig. 21  Ells, Sid­ney. Men Car­ry­ing Sacks of Bitu­mi­nous Sands as Ship­ment Pass­es Cas­cade Rapids, Athabas­ca Riv­er, Alber­ta. 1923. Pho­to­graph. MIKAN 3524747. Library and Archives Cana­da, Ottawa.

Fig. 22  McDer­mid Stu­dios Edmon­ton. Alber­ta Tar Sands Grand Trunk Pacif­ic Rail Car. 1924. Pho­to­graph. ND-3-2684. Glen­bow Archives, Calgary.

Fig. 23  Fitzsim­mons, Robert. Exper­i­men­tal Pave­ment Laid with Alber­ta Bitu­mi­nous Sand under Direc­tion of Mines Branch, Depart­ment of Mines. c1930. Pho­to­graph. A3399. Provin­cial Archives of Alber­ta, Edmonton.

Fig. 24  Ells, Sid­ney. Walk­ways at Jasper Park Lodge Sur­faced with Bitu­mi­nous Sand, Jasper, Alber­ta. 1927. Pho­to­graph. MIKAN 3524748. Library and Archives Cana­da, Ottawa.

Fig. 25   Fitzsim­mons, Robert. Ear­ly Process of Liq­ue­fy­ing Bitu­men. 1930. Pho­to­graph. PAA A3384. Provin­cial Archives of Alber­ta, Edmonton.

Fig. 26. Fitzsim­mons, Robert. Inter­na­tion­al Bitu­men Com­pa­ny Lim­it­ed. 1930. Pho­to­graph. PAA A3383.  Provin­cial Archives of Alber­ta, Edmonton.

Fig. 27  Fitzsim­mons, Robert. Tar Sands Build­ing Edmon­ton; View of Exte­ri­or of Build­ing Locat­ed at 5338-126 Avenue in Edmon­ton, Alber­ta. N.d. Pho­to­graph. PAA A3364. Provin­cial Archives of Alber­ta, Edmonton.

Fig. 28  Macken­zie Air Ser­vice. Aer­i­al view look­ing north of Abasand Oils Ltd., Horse Riv­er, Fort McMur­ray, Alta. Novem­ber, 1936. Pho­to­graph. MIKAN 3524916. Library and Archives Cana­da, Ottawa.

Fig. 29  Hume, George Sher­wood. Abasand Plant. 1944/1945. Pho­to­graph. PA-574-1074. Glen­bow Archives, Calgary.

Fig. 30  Hume, George Sher­wood. Abasand Plant 1944/1945. Pho­to­graph. PA 574-1072. Glen­bow Archives, Calgary.

Fig. 31. Hume, George Sher­wood. Abasand Plant along­side Horse Riv­er. 1944/45. Pho­to­graph. PA 574-1073. Glen­bow Archives, Calgary.

Fig. 32  Aer­i­al View of Provin­cial Government’s Pilot Plant for Extract­ing Oil from North­ern Alber­ta Tar Sands, Bitu­mont, Alber­ta. c1949-1950. Pho­to­graph. Orig­i­nal­ly pub­lished in the Cal­gary Her­ald, Feb­ru­ary 12, 1951. PA-1599-451-2. Glen­bow Archives, Calgary.

Fig. 33 Dr. Karl Clark Who Has Been in Charge of the Bitu­mi­nous Sands Project Since 1920. Bitu­mont Plant. 1949. Pho­to­graph. PA 410.3. Provin­cial Archives of Alber­ta, Edmonton.

Fig. 34. Heavy Machin­ery Used at Athabas­ca Tar Sands. 1967. Pho­to­graph. s-229-21a.tif Glen­bow Muse­um, Calgary.

Fig. 35  Fort McMurray—Great Cana­di­an Tar Sands Project. June 27, 1967. Pho­to­graph. PAA J99. Provin­cial Archives of Alber­ta, Edmonton.

Fig. 36  Heavy Machin­ery Used at Athabas­ca Tar Sands. 1967. Pho­to­graph. S-220-21. Glen­bow Archives, Calgary.

Fig. 37  Pio­neer­ing Ener­gy Togeth­er Great Cana­di­an Oil Sands Medal­lion (1975). Pho­to­graph. Gate­way Coin Auc­tions. N.d. Web. August 22, 2012.

Fig. 38  Cana­da Post Cor­po­ra­tion. Athabas­ca Tar Sands Stamp. 1978. MIKAN 2218481. Library and Archives Cana­da, Ottawa.

Works Cited

Bendik­sen, Jonas. “Fort McMur­ray 2007 Album.” Mag­num Pho­tog­ra­phy. 2007. Web. August 20, 2012.

Ben­nett, Tony. “The Exhi­bi­tionary Com­plex.” Culture/Power/History: A Read­er in Con­tem­po­rary Social The­o­ry. Ed. Nicholas B. Dirks, Geoff Eley, and Sher­ry B. Ort­ner. Prince­ton: Prince­ton Uni­ver­si­ty, 1994. Print.

Bitu­mont site.” Canada’s His­toric Places: A Fed­er­al, Provin­cial and Ter­ri­to­r­i­al Col­lab­o­ra­tion. Parks Cana­da. n.d. Web. March 3, 2012. <http://​www​.his​toric​places​.ca/​e​n​/​r​e​p​-​r​e​g​/​p​l​a​c​e​-​l​i​e​u​.​a​s​p​x​?​i​d​=​4​998>.

Braun, Bruce. “Buried Epis­te­molo­gies: The Pol­i­tics Of Nature In (Post) Colo­nial British Colum­bia.” Annals of the Asso­ci­a­tion of Amer­i­can Geo­g­ra­phers 87.1 (1997): 3-31. Print.

Burke, Peter. Eye­wit­ness­ing: The Uses of Images as His­tor­i­cal Evi­dence. NY: Cor­nell Uni­ver­si­ty, 2001. Print.

Bur­tyn­sky, Edward. The End of Oil. Edward Bur­tyn­sky Pho­to­graph­ic Works. n.d. Web. August 20, 2012.

Caley, John. “Memo­r­i­al to George Sher­wood Hume 1893-1965.” Geo­log­i­cal Soci­ety of Amer­i­ca Bul­letin 77:9 (Sep­tem­ber 1966): 179-184. Print.

Cas­tree, Noel, and Bruce Braun. “Con­struct­ing Rur­al Natures.” Hand­book of Rur­al Stud­ies. Ed. Paul J. Cloke, Ter­ry Mars­den, and Patrick H. Mooney. Lon­don: Sage, 2006. Print.

Chastko, Paul. Devel­op­ing Alberta’s Oil Sands from Karl Clark to Kyoto. Cal­gary: Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­gary, 2004. Print.

Com­fort, Dar­lene. The Abasand Fias­co: The Rise and Fall of a Brave Pio­neer Oil Sands Extrac­tion Plant. Ed. Peter G. Duffy. Edmon­ton: Friesen Print­ers, 1980. Print.

David­son, Debra J., and Mike Gis­mon­di. Chal­leng­ing Legit­i­ma­cy at the Precipice of Ener­gy Calami­ty. New York: Springer Press, 2011. Print.

Deans Cameron, Agnes. The New North. Being Some Account of a Woman’s Jour­ney through Cana­da to the Arc­tic. New York: Apple­ton, 1909. Print.
Ells, Sid­ney C. Rec­ol­lec­tions of the Devel­op­ment of the Athabas­ca Oil Sands. Ottawa: Depart­ment of Mines and Tech­ni­cal Sur­veys, Mines Branch, 1962. Print.

Essick, Peter. Nation­al Geo­graph­ic Oil Sands Images. Auro­ra Pho­tos. 2009. Web. August 20, 2012.

Fer­gu­son, Bar­ry G. Athabas­ca Oil Sands: North­ern Resource Explo­ration 1875-1951. Regi­na, SK: Cana­di­an Plains Research Cen­ter, 1985. Print.

Gabara, Esther. “Recy­cled Pho­tographs: Mov­ing Still Images of Mex­i­co City, 1950-2000.” Pho­tog­ra­phy and Writ­ing in Latin Amer­i­ca: Dou­ble Expo­sures. Ed. Mar­cy E. Schwartz and Mary Beth Tier­ney-Tel­lo. Albu­querque: Uni­ver­si­ty of New Mex­i­co, 2006. Print.

Hajer, Maarten, and Wytske Ver­steeg. “A Decade of Dis­course Analy­sis of Envi­ron­men­tal Pol­i­tics: Achieve­ments, Chal­lenges, Per­spec­tives.” Jour­nal of Envi­ron­men­tal Pol­i­cy & Plan­ning 7.3 (2005): 175-84. Print.

Hari­man, Robert, and John Louis Lucaites. No Cap­tion Need­ed: Icon­ic Pho­tographs, Pub­lic Cul­ture, and Lib­er­al Democ­ra­cy. Chica­go: Uni­ver­si­ty of Chica­go, 2007. Print.

Hel­big, Louis. Beau­ti­ful Destruc­tion. n.d. Web. August 20, 2012. <http://​www​.beau​ti​fulde​struc​tion​.ca>.

Hon­oured CPHFS Mem­bers.” Cana­di­an Petro­le­um Hall of Fame. 2011. Web. August 20, 2012.

Huber, Matthew. “Ener­giz­ing His­tor­i­cal Mate­ri­al­ism: Fos­sil Fuels, Space and the Cap­i­tal­ist Mode of Pro­duc­tion.” Geo­fo­rum 40 (2008): 105-115. Print.

Hunt, Joyce. Local Push—Global Pull: The Untold His­to­ry of the Athabas­ka Oil Sands. 1900-1930. Cal­gary: Push Pull Ltd, 2011. Print.

LeCain, Tim­o­thy J. Mass Destruc­tion: The Men and Giant Mines that Wired Amer­i­ca and Scarred the Plan­et. New Brunswick, NJ: Rut­gers Uni­ver­si­ty, 2009. Print.

Liv­ing­stone, David N. Putting Sci­ence in Its Place: Geo­gra­phies of Sci­en­tif­ic Knowl­edge. Chica­go: Uni­ver­si­ty of Chica­go, 2003. Print.

Mitchell, W.J. Thomas. Ed. Land­scape and Pow­er. Chica­go: Uni­ver­si­ty of Chica­go, 1994. Print.

Mraz, J. Nacho Lopéz, Mex­i­can Pho­tog­ra­ph­er. Min­neapo­lis-Lon­don: Uni­ver­si­ty of Min­neso­ta Press. 2003. Print.

Osborne, Bri­an S. “Land­scapes, Mem­o­ry, Mon­u­ments, and Com­mem­o­ra­tion: Putting Iden­ti­ty in Its Place.” Library and Archives of Cana­da. 2001. Web. August 20, 2012. <http://​epe​.lac​-bac​.gc​.ca/​1​0​0​/​2​0​0​/​3​0​0​/​c​i​t​i​z​e​n​s​h​i​p​_​a​n​d​_​i​m​m​i​g​r​a​t​i​o​n​_​c​a​n​a​d​a​_​m​e​t​r​o​p​o​l​i​s​/​l​a​n​d​s​c​a​p​e​s​_​m​e​m​o​r​y​-​e​/​p​u​t​i​n​d​e​n​.​pdf>.

Pay Dirt: Alberta’s Oil Sands: Cen­turies in the Mak­ing.” Pay Dirt Pic­tures. 2005. Web. August 20, 2012.

Pratt, Lar­ry, and Mati­na Karvel­las. “Nature and Nation: Herder, Myth and Cul­tur­al Nation­al­ism in Cana­da.” Nation­al His­to­ry 1.1 (1997): 58-77. Print.

Richards, John, and Lar­ry Pratt. Prairie Cap­i­tal­ism: Pow­er and Influ­ence in the New West. Toron­to: McClel­land and Stew­art, 1979. Print.

Raen­to, Pauli­ina and Stan­ley D. Brunn. “Visu­al­iz­ing Fin­land: Postage Stamps as Polit­i­cal Mes­sen­gers.” Geografiska Annaler Series B: Human Geog­ra­phy 87.2 (2005): 145-164. Print.

Sand­los, John. “Land­scap­ing Desire: Poet­ics, Pol­i­tics in the Ear­ly Bio­log­i­cal Sur­veys of the Cana­di­an North.” Space & Cul­ture 6.4 (2003): 394-414. Print.

Schwartz, Joan M. “More Than ‘Com­pe­tent Descrip­tions of an Intractably Emp­ty Land­scape’: A Strat­e­gy for Crit­i­cal Engage­ment with His­tor­i­cal Pho­tographs.” His­tor­i­cal Geog­ra­phy 31 (2003): 105-30. Print.

Schwartz, Joan M. “Pho­tographs from The Edge Of Empire.” Cul­tur­al Geog­ra­phy in Prac­tice. Ed. A. Blunt, P. Gruffudd, J. May, M. Ogborn, D. Pin­der, D. Lon­don: Arnold, 2003: 154-171. Print.

Schwartz, Joan M. “Pho­to­graph­ic Reflec­tions: Nature, Land­scape, and Envi­ron­ment.” Envi­ron­men­tal His­to­ry 12 (2007): 966-93. Print.

Scott, James. See­ing Like a State. How Cer­tain Schemes to Improve the Human Con­di­tion Have Failed. New Haven: Yale Uni­ver­si­ty Press, 1999. Print.

Shep­pard, Mary Clark. Oil Sands Sci­en­tist: The Let­ters of Karl A. Clark. Edmon­ton: Uni­ver­si­ty of Alber­ta, 1989. Print.

Webb, Alex. Fort McMur­ray Oil­sands Album. Mag­num Pho­tos. 2005. Web. August 20, 2012.

Zaslow, Mor­ris. The Open­ing of the Cana­di­an North 1870-1914. Toron­to: McClel­land and Stew­art, 1971. Print.

Zeller, Suzanne. Invent­ing Cana­da: Ear­ly Vic­to­ri­an Sci­ence and the Idea of a Transcon­ti­nen­tal Nation. Toron­to: Uni­ver­si­ty of Toron­to, 1987. Print.

Endnotes

[1] This paper advances on argu­ments from chap­ters 3 and 4 of Debra J. David­son and Mike Gis­mon­di, Chal­leng­ing Legit­i­ma­cy at the Precipice of Ener­gy Calamity.

[2] The name “tar sands” is used con­sis­tent­ly in the his­tor­i­cal record. See our dis­cus­sion of oil sands ver­sus tar sands in David­son and Gis­mon­di (27-28).

[3] The Hume Fond (Glen­bow Muse­um) and his col­lec­tion of over 1450 pho­tographs pro­vide almost 37 years of visu­al images of sev­er­al of Alberta’s impor­tant oil and gas wells and indus­try sites. See Caley for dis­cus­sion of his career.


Copy­right Mike Gis­mon­di and Debra J. David­son. This arti­cle is licensed under a  Cre­ative Com­mons 3.0 License although cer­tain works ref­er­enced here­in may be sep­a­rate­ly licensed, or the author has exer­cised their right to fair deal­ing under the Cana­di­an Copy­right Act.